(no subject)
Jul. 19th, 2007 10:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
candylandReally quick post here, and then I should probably get going. Looooong day tomorrow--we're on the road at 9:30 AM, running about a gazillion errands, and then closing the day with a Broadway show. Life is sweetness and light :D
Oh, and in case you didn't know, they're at it again! Wank, wank, gloooooorious wank!
The big thing here has been demanding a clear definition of obscenity laws--which no one as yet has been able to give...which isn't surprising, given that the Supreme Court hasn't even been able to give a standard definition, and so it is judged on a community basis. And when someone pointed out that fictional works about minors engaged in sexual activity was not mentioned in the obscenity law,![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
burr86, I kid you not, posted this in response:
It doesn't *exclude* works of fiction, which means that it includes it. :-/
...goodnight, everyone.
Oh, and in case you didn't know, they're at it again! Wank, wank, gloooooorious wank!
The big thing here has been demanding a clear definition of obscenity laws--which no one as yet has been able to give...which isn't surprising, given that the Supreme Court hasn't even been able to give a standard definition, and so it is judged on a community basis. And when someone pointed out that fictional works about minors engaged in sexual activity was not mentioned in the obscenity law,
burr86, I kid you not, posted this in response:It doesn't *exclude* works of fiction, which means that it includes it. :-/
...goodnight, everyone.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-20 10:04 am (UTC)...
Hate.
*sighs and goes to browse anyway. It's not as if I had better things to do. /sarcasm*
Have a good day Candy. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-20 12:44 pm (UTC)